Development of Structured Essay Diagnostic Test of Chemistry on Acid Base Titration Materials as an Instrument for Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes

Crismonia Rinta, Zonalia Fitriza

Article Metrics

The abstract has been viewed for 197 times.
The full pdf article has been downloaded for 145 times.

Total Citations

This citation data is acquired through it's entry on Dimensions.Ai website.

Abstract

Learning difficulties experienced by students in a subject can affect their learning outcomes. Learning difficulties can be caused by misconceptions experienced by students or knowledge barriers. It can be happened because chemistry has complex materials which require students to comprehend prerequisite concepts before mastering complex concepts. This research aims to develop a Structured Essay Diagnostic Test of Chemistry for acid-base titration material that fulfils good criteria as an instrument for identifying misconceptions, learning barriers, and assessing student learning outcomes. The research procedure consists of 3 stages: determining the content, obtaining information about students misconceptions, and developing a diagnostic test. The SEDToC instrument was tested for validity and reliability. The SEDToC was validated by four educational chemists and high school chemistry teachers. Which was concluded that the SEDToC instrument is valid, and reliable in the very high category. Analysis of the difficulty index of the SEDToC instrument obtained 10 items in the easy category and 18 questions in the difficult category. The analysis of the discriminatory power of the questions was obtained that 6 items were in a bad category, 18 questions were in the sufficient category, three item was in a good category and one item was in a very good category. The results of the study using the SEDToC instrument for acid-base titration materials proved that the SEDToC instrument was able to assess student learning outcomes, identify misconceptions, and material inhibiting students.

Keywords

Acid-Base Titration, Inhibiting Materials, Learning Outcomes, Misconceptions, SEDToC

References

Fitriza Z, Aini FQ, Handayani P, Munira I. Development of structured essay diagnostic test of chemistry (SEDToC) to investigate senior high school student’s conception of buffer solution Student’s Conception of Buffer Solution. 3rd Int Semin Chem Educ. 2020;020012.

Sheppard K. High school students' understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. 2006;7:32–45.

Astuti RT, Marzuki H. Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Titrasi Asam Basa Siswa Sma. Orbital J Pendidik Kim. 2018;1(1):22–7.

Supatmi S, Setiawan A, Rahmawati Y. Jakarta UN. Students’ misconceptions of acid-base titration assessments using a two - tier multiple-choice diagnostic test. African J Chem Educ. 2019;9(1).

Orwat K, Bernard P, Migdał-Mikuli A. Alternative conceptions of common salt hydrolysis among upper-secondaryschool students. J Balt Sci Educ. 2017;16(1):64–76.

Gurel DK, Eryilmaz A, McDermott LC. A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2015;11(5):989–1008.

Demircioǧlu G, Ayas A, Demircioǧlu H. Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2005;6(1):36–51.

Ilmah M. Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Asam Basa dengan Menggunakan Instrumen Test Diagnostik Two-Tier. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. 2017;

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Atas. 2017;

Rositari D, Saridewi N, Agung S. Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Untuk Mendeteksi Miskonsepsi Siswa Sma Pada Topik Asam-Basa. Edusains. 2015;6(2):169–76.

Schmidt HJ. Students’ misconceptions - Looking for a pattern. Sci Educ. 1997;81(2):123–35.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Tes Diagnostik. 2007;

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2016.

Jespersen ND, Brady JE. Chemistry: the Moleculer Nature of Matter. Wiley; 2012.

Silberberg M. Principle of General Chemistry, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

Chang R. Chemistry 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194–7.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen S V. Focus on research methods: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Heal. 2007;30(4):459–67.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2011.

Dj L. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang; 2011.

Hamzah A. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.; 2014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v4.i2.a353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.