The Development of Acid Base E-Module Based on Scientific Literacy

Nadya Ulfa, Ani Sutiani

Article Metrics

The abstract has been viewed for 272 times.
The full pdf article has been downloaded for 148 times.

Total Citations

This citation data is acquired through it's entry on Dimensions.Ai website.

Abstract

Teaching material is one of the aspects to improve scientific literacy skills had by students, but based on the analysis of school textbooks, especially on acid-base materials, 2 chemistry textbook do not yet have the maximum application of scientific literacy. The aim of this research is to develop acid base e-module based on scientific literacy. The method implemented is Research and Development (R and D) method by Borg and Gall which is limited to 7 out of 10 stages. The instrument used in this study was questionnaire of validity and practicality. Validation was carried out by 5 validators while the practicality test was distributed to 2 chemistry teachers and 20 students of Class XI Science of SMA Negeri 10 Medan. Based on the validation results obtained from the validators, the average result is 4,70 which a very feasible criteria. The average value of teachers and students practicality responses was 4,60 and 4,42 with a very feasible criteria so it was concluded the acid-base e-module based on scientific literacy is valid, practical and also feasible to be used in learning activities for high school students. The follow-up of this research is to conduct a trial of the effectiveness of using e-modules in improving students’ scientific literacy skills.

Keywords

Acid Base; E-Module; Scientific Literacy

References

OECD. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Programme for International Student Assessment. 2014.

Suratsih. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Potensi Lokal Dalam Kerangka Implementasi KTSP SMA di Yogyakarta. Penelitian Unggulan UNY (Multitahun). 2010.

OECD. PISA 2018 Results: Combined Executive Summaries Volume I, II, &III. 2019.

Rusilowati A, Nugroho SE, Susilowati SME. Development of Science Textbook Based on Scientific Literacy for Secondary School. J Pendidik Fis Indones. 2016;12(2):98-105.

Chiappetta EL, Fillman DA, Sethna GH. A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. J Res Sci Teach. 1991; 28(8):713-725.

Rokhmah A, Sunarno W, Masykuri M. Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. J Pendidik Fis Indones. 2017;13(1):19-24.

Adisendjaja YH. Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi Sma Kelas X Di Kota Bandung. J BIO-UPI; 2010.

Bröder J, Okan O, Bauer U, Bruland D, Schlupp S, Bollweg TM, et al. Health literacy in childhood and youth: A systematic review of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(361):1–25.

Horton WF. Understanding Understanding information literacy: a primer; an easy-to-read, non-technical overview explaining what information literacy means, designed for busy public policy-makers, business executives, civil society administrators and practicing professionals. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2007.

Bent, Moira, Stubbing RS. The SCONUL Seven Pillar of Information Literacy: Core Model: For Higher Education; 2011.

Nurdyansyah, Fahyuni EF. Inovasi Model Pembelajaran Sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Creative Commons Attribution; 2016.

Wijaya JE, Vidianti A. The Effectiveness of Using Interactive Electronic Modules on Student Learning Outcomes in Education Innovation Course. International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020;422(Icope 2019):86–89.

Sugiani KA, Degeng INS, Setyosari P, Sulton. The Effects of Electronic Modules in Constructivist Blended Learning Approaches to Improve Learning Independence. Int J Innov Creat Chang. 2019;10(9):82–93.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta; 2015.

Husein U. Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: Rajawali Press; 2011.

Depdiknas. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas; 2008.

Suryanto A, Djatmiko T. Konsep Dasar Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran; Eval Pembelajaran di SD. Universitas Terbuka; 2014.

Kemendikbud. Panduan Praktis Penyusunan E-Modul. 2017;1–57.

Lasmiyati, Harta I. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Minat SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 2014;9(2):161–174.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v3.i3.a299

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.