Comparison of Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Students Through Guided Discovery Learning and Guided Inquiry on Chemical Equilibrium Materials

Winda Fajriati, Zonalia Fitriza

Article Metrics

The abstract has been viewed for 377 times.
The full pdf article has been downloaded for 171 times.

Total Citations

This citation data is acquired through it's entry on Dimensions.Ai website.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare the student’s result study who learn using Guided Discovery models and Guided Inquiry models. The research sample is 2 classes XI Science in one of the high schools at SMAN 9 Padang, sample class 1 is the Guided Discovery model treatment and sample class 2 is with the Guided Inquiry model. The research design was Randomized Posttest-Only Comparison Controls Groups Design. The instrument in the study was the learning achievement test (posttest). The results of the study stated that: (1) learning outcomes with the Guided Discovery and Guided Inquiry models there were differences, but not significant. Evidenced by the averages student’s result study of the two classes that have a slight difference, namely sample class 1 (81.86) while sample
class 2 (84.36). (2) The results of the statistical test of hypothesis testing with the t test (α = 0.05) obtained tcount = 0.65 and ttable = 1.99. The results show thats the Guided Discovery and Guided Inquiry models effectively improve student learning outcomes.

Keywords

Guided discovery learning, guided inquiry, student’s learning outcomes

References

Sheehan PE. What’s difficult about chemistry? Chem Educ Res Pract 2009;10:204–18.

Lukum A. Metakognisi Mahasiswa Dalam Pembelajaran Kesetimbangan Kimia. J Ilmu Pendidik 2015;9–18.

Guci SRF. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Tiga Level Representasi Menggunakan Prezi Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. 2017;

Maharani TY. Kajian Dual Situated Learning Model (DSLM) untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. IPA 2016;1:706–14.

Andriyani L and IH. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia. Tadris Kim 2 2017;1(Juni 2017):104–8.

Indrawati R. Pembelajaran Remedi Menggunakan Modul dan Animasi Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Ditinjau dari Tingkat Kesulitan Belajar Siswa. 2009;

Nurdyansyah. Inovasi Model. Sidoarjo: Nizamial Learning Center; 2016.

Kosasih E. Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya; 2014.

Yerimadesi. Pengembangan Model Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Kimia di SMA. 2018;

Sofiani E. Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing (Guided Inquiry) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Pada Konsep Listrik Dinamis. 2011;2.

Hanson DM. Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. Pacific Crest 2005;(2nd edition).

Rohim F. Penerapan Model Discovery Terbimbing Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. UPEJ (Unnes Phys Educ Journal) 2012;1:1–5.

Sumarniti NN, Arcana IN, Wibawa IC. Pengaruh Model Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Pada Siswa kelas V di SD Gugus VII Kecamatan Sawan Tahun Pelajaran 2013 / 2014. J Mimbar PGSD Univesitas Pendidik Ganesha 2014;2(1).

Sukma, Komariyah L, Syam M. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing (Guided Inquiry) dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Saintifika 2016;18(1):59–63.

Dewi L. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. e-Journal Progr Pascasarj Univ Pendidik Ganesha 2013;3(1):41–7.

Sukmadinata NS. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2009.

Nazir M. Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia; 2013.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v2.i1.a113

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.